The Proud Parents
the proud parentsparenting videossubmit your proud parentParenting FAQsAbout Us Follow us on TwitterRSS FeedFollow us on Facebook

PROUD PARENTS: IN THE NEWS


Remember that awesome dad we posted that got the back piece of his wife and kids? Well turns out his wife sucks. After shelling out £870 on the tattoo paying tribute to the family he loved so much, his wife left him for a 25 year old work pal. Find the full story after the jump!

Courtesy of DailyMail.co.uk

After 15 happy years with his wife, Alan Jenkins decided it was time for the ultimate expression of love.

So, determined to prove his devotion, he had a lifesize image of her face – along with those of their two daughters – tattooed on his back.

The painful procedure took 20 hours and cost £870.

Unfortunately for the besotted Alan, it also backfired on a monumental scale after Lisa, 36, absconded with a 25-year-old Latvian hunk she had met at work.

Speaking last night, the jilted steelworker, said: “It’s a real sickener. I thought she was happy.

“I had it because I thought we loved each other – I feel very betrayed.”

Lisa met her new love, fitness instructor Kaspars Gavars, at work and now intends to move him into the family home in Port Talbot, South Wales, – once Alan has moved out.

“I didn’t plan to fall in love with Kaspars – it just happened,” she said.

“And I never wanted Alan to have my face tattooed on his back in the first place.”

Alan, who has two girls Daniella, ten and Jade, 15, only grew suspicious after Kaspars started giving Lisa lifts to work.

He could be forgiven for wanting his wife off his back for good, but despite his heartache, he has no plans to have to tattoo removed.

“Lisa may have left me but she’ll be on my back forever thanks to the tattoo,” he said.

“But I’ve still got plenty of room on my chest if I get hooked up again.

Original Story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-486319/Husband-gets-870-life-size-tattoo-wife–discovers-having-affair.html#ixzz1n9tDeY5c

25 Comments to PROUD PARENTS: IN THE NEWS

  1. Does she only own the one dress?

  2. NR on February 22nd, 2012
  3. And now… the real reason you never get a tattoo!

  4. John C on February 22nd, 2012
  5. This can’t be the entire story. The pictures were taken in the same area on the same day with her in the same dress. That can’t be coincidence.

  6. Jamie on February 22nd, 2012
  7. yeaaaahhh… so like, were these pictures taken at the same time in the same place??

  8. bodhi on February 22nd, 2012
  9. publicity stunt. FAKE. she’s wearing the same shirt in both photos. FAKE FAKE FAKE.

  10. eatAdick on February 22nd, 2012
  11. freaking fake because shes wearing the same thing… they should have done a wardrobe change at least…

  12. Cosmo on February 22nd, 2012
  13. John C.- the real reason you dont get your S/O tattooed on you.

  14. brandi b on February 22nd, 2012
  15. What, a woman can’t wear a shirt more than once?

    The fuck is wrong with you people?

  16. Kinseth on February 23rd, 2012
  17. Cougar alert!!!

  18. Kendall on February 23rd, 2012
  19. a whole family of chuds…kill yourselves

  20. Josh on February 23rd, 2012
  21. …he paid almost 1000 pounds for -that- shitty thing? hope he kept the sales slip cause whom-ever pulled off that banditry should be charged for theft and vandalism. and the family man himself should be fined for being an idiot.

  22. KXG on February 23rd, 2012
  23. She looks more like a daughter

    Yep … publicity stunt

  24. netjnke on February 23rd, 2012
  25. gee, maybe because this is a report from a newspaper or something, they did a photo shoot. dumb-asses for real, yo… hence why shes in the same effing dress. take a brain pill, and grow some logic.

  26. Natasha on February 23rd, 2012
  27. This was probably a photo shoot for the story. Doesn’t mean its fake. They probably got everyone together so they could get pictures for the story for the news.

  28. Danielle on February 23rd, 2012
  29. He’s got a reverse farmer’s tan going on hardcore. How does that even happen?

  30. Stef on February 23rd, 2012
  31. I’am with most here, this is fake!!!! However if it’s true, why and how can she get the house?

  32. loki on February 24th, 2012
  33. Who the hell would want to crawl into bed with that nasty dried up prune? Although, she might have alot of money. Or it’s really dark there…cause everyone is hot in the dark.

  34. Numyummy on February 24th, 2012
  35. The tattoo of Lisa looks better than Lisa actually does.

  36. Melba on February 24th, 2012
  37. Stupid middle-aged slut. With any luck her new boyfriend will beat her often.

  38. AlfaCowboy on February 24th, 2012
  39. Bogus….3 daughters. The oldest is married.

  40. K J B on February 24th, 2012
  41. Why would they get the broken family together for a picture? What broken family would even be willing to do that? What a flawed theory. Unless its a publicity stunt. Which it
    So obviously is.

  42. Axle on February 24th, 2012
  43. All of the girls, and tattoos, are of his daughters.

  44. ? on February 26th, 2012
  45. FAKE!! It’s a Photo Shop Chop and Cut People!!!!

  46. Beaners on February 27th, 2012
  47. thats why you should never get a tat of a girl’s name/face. as soon as you get one, she WILL cheat on you. no doubt about it.

  48. A WHITE GUY on February 28th, 2012
  49. Look closely at her hair. Her head was put on someone else’s body and the couple was placed digitally on the same background as the family.

  50. millcity on March 2nd, 2012

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Ring Blogs  

© Copyright 2011 The Proud Parents

home  //  video  //  submit  //  faq  //  about  //  terms & conditions  //  privacy policy


Three Ring Focus: Marketing & Web Design

Three Ring Blog Network